Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Xiaomi Mix Fold | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 802412 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 8.01 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 2480 x 1860 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 317 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 173,3 x 133,4 x 7,62 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mix Fold: Xiaomi Redmi K60 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40S 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 6/64Gb - Compare |
126.52€ ($148.52) See Details |
Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Mix Fold’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Mix Fold | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Mix Fold | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5020 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mix Fold in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 802412 score points which is 922.88% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Mix Fold in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1138 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 581.44% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3787 vs 546 (593.59% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Mix Fold and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mix Fold (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 922.88% faster in the Antutu test (723966 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2480 x 1860 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mix Fold (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 136 grams less (181 vs 317).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Mix Fold related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold
- Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
- Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Xiaomi Pocophone Poco X3
- Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Xiaomi Mi Mix 2
- Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold vs Xiaomi Poco F3
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2