Compare Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Xiaomi POCO C85 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 258622 | 78446 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G81 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 1640 x 720 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 205 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 173,16 × 81,07 × 8,1 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi POCO C85: Xiaomi 12S Ultra 8/256GB Chinese version - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 9s 4/64Gb - Compare |
126.97€ ($148.27) See Details |
Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi POCO C85’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi POCO C85 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi POCO C85 | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCO C85 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 258622 score points which is 229.68% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCO C85 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 405 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 142.51% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1383 vs 546 (153.30% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi POCO C85 and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCO C85 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 229.68% faster in the Antutu test (180176 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1640 x 720 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCO C85 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 24 grams less (181 vs 205).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi POCO C85 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 15C vs Xiaomi POCO C85
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C71 vs Xiaomi POCO C85
- Compare Realme C75 vs Xiaomi POCO C85
- Compare Xiaomi POCO C85 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro vs Xiaomi POCO C85
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2