Compare Ulefone Armor 12 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb
| Name | Ulefone Armor 12 | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 292188 | 287111 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Diagonal size | 6.52 " | 6.18 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 2246х1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 91 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 92 | |
| dxomark (video) | 90 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Battery | 5180 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal frame and plastic case |
| Weight | 296 g | 182 g |
| Dimensions | 175.9 x 82.5 x 14.25 mm | 155,5 x 75,2 x 8,8 mm |
| Price | 216.29€ ($246.96) See Details | 275.00€ ($313.99) See Details |
Ulefone Armor 12 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 12’s camera vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 12 | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 12 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 12 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 12 | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5180 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Ulefone Armor 12 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 12 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 292188 score points which is 1.77% faster than the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb, which got 287111. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 12 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 12 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 531 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb which got 520, it is 2.12% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1723 vs 2282 (-24.50% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 12 and Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 12 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1.77% faster in the Antutu test (5077 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 5180mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1180mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 12 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 114 grams less (182 vs 296).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 16Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2246х1080 vs 1600x720.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Ulefone Armor 12 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 12 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare Ulefone Armor 12 vs Ulefone Armor 11
- Compare Ulefone Armor 10 5G vs Ulefone Armor 12
- Compare Ulefone Armor 12 vs Doogee V10
- Compare Ulefone Armor 12 vs Ulefone Armor 11T 5G
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Apple iPhone 7 Ref vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs UMIDIGI F1
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1