Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 287111 | 148199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P70 |
| Diagonal size | 6.18 " | 5.7 " |
| Resolution | 2246х1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 6 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX230 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 91 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 92 | |
| dxomark (video) | 90 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 182 g | 364 g |
| Dimensions | 155,5 x 75,2 x 8,8 mm | 164,8 x 79,2 x 18,2 mm |
| Price | 275.00€ ($294.10) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 3W: Ulefone Armor 6S - Compare Ulefone Armor X6 - Compare Ulefone Armor 11 - Compare |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 3W’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 21Mp Sony IMX230 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 21 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Sony IMX230 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Ulefone Armor 3W, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 3W |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 10300 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 287111 score points which is 93.73% faster than the Ulefone Armor 3W, which got 148199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 3W: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 520 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 3W which got 320, it is 62.50% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2282 vs 1475 (54.71% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb and Ulefone Armor 3W? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 93.73% faster in the Antutu test (138912 score difference).
- Best weight: 182 grams less (182 vs 364).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2246х1080 vs 2160x1080.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 3W (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 21Mp Sony IMX230 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- NFC supports.
- More battery capacity: 10300mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 6300mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 3W (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Apple iPhone 7 Ref vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs UMIDIGI F1
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
Ulefone Armor 3W related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9500 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Blackview BV9500 vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3W vs UMIDIGI F2
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6E vs Ulefone Armor 3W
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs Ulefone Armor 3W