Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9E
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 9E |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 287111 | 223811 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| Diagonal size | 6.18 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2246х1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Samsung GW1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | 91 | |
| dxomark (photo) | 92 | |
| dxomark (video) | 90 | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 8.1 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 182 g | 320 g |
| Dimensions | 155,5 x 75,2 x 8,8 mm | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm |
| Price | 275.00€ ($323.07) See Details | 311.93€ ($366.46) See Details |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9E: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 9E’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX363 sensor and the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 9E |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 12 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX363 | Samsung GW1 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9E: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Ulefone Armor 9E, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb | Ulefone Armor 9E |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9E: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 287111 score points which is 28.28% faster than the Ulefone Armor 9E, which got 223811. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb vs Ulefone Armor 9E: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 520 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 9E which got 417, it is 24.70% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2282 vs 1531 (49.05% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb and Ulefone Armor 9E? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 28.28% faster in the Antutu test (63300 score difference).
- Best weight: 138 grams less (182 vs 320).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9E (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 12Mp Sony IMX363
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 2246х1080.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 2600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 6/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Apple iPhone 7 Ref vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs UMIDIGI F1
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 vs Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1
Ulefone Armor 9E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9800 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Blackview BV9800 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs Ulefone Armor 9E
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6S vs Ulefone Armor 9E