0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB

Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi Poco C3 with Nokia 3.2 2/16GB.

Name Xiaomi Poco C3 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Xiaomi Poco C3 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Antutu benchmark 109489 78446
CPU MediaTek Helio G35 Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
Diagonal size 6.53 " 6.26 "
Resolution 1600x720 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 32 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5020 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 9.0
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 194 g 181 g
Dimensions 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C3:
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 12/512Gb - Compare
Xiaomi 12T 8/128GB - Compare
Xiaomi Poco F3 6/128GB - Compare
127.67€ ($145.86) See Details

Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco C3’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Xiaomi Poco C3 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Xiaomi Poco C3 Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
Battery 5020 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No No

Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison. Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Poco C3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 109489 score points which is 39.57% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi Poco C3
6.53" (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G35 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 5020mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
127.67€
$145.86
 

Xiaomi Poco C3 vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Poco C3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 175 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 4.79% faster. In "Multi-core" score 984 vs 546 (80.22% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi Poco C3
6.53" (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G35 / 2Gb / 32GB / 13Mp / 5020mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 429 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh
127.67€
$145.86
 

What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco C3 and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 39.57% faster in the Antutu test (31043 score difference).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 5020mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1020mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have infrared blaster supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C3 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)

  • Best weight: 13 grams less (181 vs 194).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support
  • Does not have infrared blaster supports.

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Xiaomi Poco C3 related comparisons

Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.62/5 of 13
Frequent comparisons