Compare Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i

Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi Poco C65 with Xiaomi Mi4i.
Name	Xiaomi Poco C65	Xiaomi Mi4i

Antutu benchmark	217622
CPU	MediaTek Helio G85	Qualcomm Snapdragon 615
Diagonal size	6.74 "	5 "
Resolution	1600x720	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	6 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	50 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Samsung S5KJN1
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5000 mAh	3200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 13
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	192 g	130 g
Dimensions	168 x 78 x 8.09 mm	138 x 69 x 7.8 mm
Price	107.14€ ($125.65) See Details	Discontinued. View all Xiaomi models here Alternatives to the Xiaomi Mi4i: Xiaomi Redmi 9C 3/64GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7A 2/16Gb - Compare Xiaomi 12 Lite 6/128GB - Compare

Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco C65’s camera vs Xiaomi Mi4i’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Xiaomi Poco C65	Xiaomi Mi4i
Rear camera	50 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Samsung S5KJN1
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Xiaomi Poco C65	Xiaomi Mi4i
Battery	5000 mAh	3200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Poco C65 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 217622 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Mi4i, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi Poco C65

6.74 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G85 / 6Gb / 128GB / 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 / 5000mAh

107.14€

$125.65

217622

Xiaomi Mi4i

5" (1920x1080) / Snapdragon 615 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Xiaomi Mi4i: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Poco C65 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 379 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Mi4i which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1378 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi Poco C65

6.74 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio G85 / 6Gb / 128GB / 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 / 5000mAh

107.14€

$125.65

379 / 1378

Xiaomi Mi4i

5" (1920x1080) / Snapdragon 615 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 3200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco C65 and Xiaomi Mi4i? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C65 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 compared to 13Mp
NFC supports.
More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3200mAh (a difference of 1800mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C65 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Mi4i (advantages)

Best weight: 62 grams less (130 vs 192).
Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1600x720.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Mi4i (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Xiaomi Poco C65 related comparisons

Xiaomi Mi4i related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons