Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro
| Name | Xiaomi Poco C75 | Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 244377 | 101844 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G81 | MediaTek Helio G25 |
| Diagonal size | 6.88 " | 5.93 " |
| Resolution | 1640 x 720 | 1440x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 9600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 12 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 204 g | 405 g |
| Dimensions | 171.88 x 77.8 x 8.22 mm | 173.4 x 83.35 x 18.3 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Poco C75: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G 6/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 5 12/256GB - Compare |
136.48€ ($159.99) See Details |
Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Poco C75’s camera vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco C75 | Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Poco C75 | Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 9600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 14-15 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco C75 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 244377 score points which is 139.95% faster than the Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro, which got 101844. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Poco C75 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 391 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro which got 171, it is 128.65% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1391 vs 955 (45.65% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Poco C75 and Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C75 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 139.95% faster in the Antutu test (142533 score difference).
- Best weight: 201 grams less (204 vs 405).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 13Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1640 x 720 vs 1440x720.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C75 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 9600mAh vs 5160mAh (a difference of 4440mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Poco C75 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C75
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C75 vs Xiaomi Redmi 12
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C75
Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro vs Ulefone Power Armor X11 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor X13 vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro