Compare Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB vs Zopo zp600+ (3D)

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB vs Zopo zp600+ (3D) Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB with Zopo zp600+ (3D).
Name	Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB	Zopo zp600+ (3D)

Antutu benchmark	593219
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Diagonal size	6.67 "	"
Resolution	2400x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10
RAM	6 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	Yes
ROM	128 GB	GB
External memory	No
Rear camera	64 Mp	Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX686
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	Mp
Battery	4700 mAh	mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	5 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Metal frame and glass case
Weight	218 g	g
Dimensions	163.3 x 75.4 x 8.9 mm	mm
Price	399.00€ ($462.92) See Details	Discontinued. View all Zopo models here Alternatives to the Zopo zp600+ (3D):

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro’s camera vs Zopo zp600+ (3D)’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB	Zopo zp600+ (3D)
Rear camera	64 Mp	Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX686
Flash
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro vs Zopo zp600+ (3D), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB	Zopo zp600+ (3D)
Battery	4700 mAh	mAh
Type	Non-removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 593219 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Zopo zp600+ (3D), which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB

6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 865 / 6Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4700mAh

399.00€

$462.92

593219

Zopo zp600+ (3D)

147.57€

$171.21

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 915 points score in "Single-core" of against the Zopo zp600+ (3D) which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3309 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB

6.67 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / Snapdragon 865 / 6Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX686 / 4700mAh

399.00€

$462.92

915 / 3309

Zopo zp600+ (3D)

147.57€

$171.21

0 / 0

What is the difference between Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB and Zopo zp600+ (3D)? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB (advantages)

NFC supports.
Have fast charging supports.
Have infrared blaster supports.
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Zopo zp600+ (3D) (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Zopo zp600+ (3D) (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support
Does not have infrared blaster supports.
Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Xiaomi Pocophone F2 Pro 6/128GB related comparisons

Zopo zp600+ (3D) related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 126

Frequent comparisons