Compare Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Cubot Pocket 3
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 13C | Cubot Pocket 3 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 231477 | 209744 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G88 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
| Diagonal size | 6.74 " | 4.5 " |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 1170x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | No |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 192 g | g |
| Dimensions | 168 x 78 x 8.1 mm | mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 13C: Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 6/64Gb - Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G 6/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Mi6X 4/64Gb - Compare |
167.88€ ($196.79) See Details |
Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Cubot Pocket 3: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi 13C’s camera vs Cubot Pocket 3’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 20Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 13C | Cubot Pocket 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | |
| Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Cubot Pocket 3: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Cubot Pocket 3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi 13C | Cubot Pocket 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 4-5 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Cubot Pocket 3: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi 13C in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 231477 score points which is 10.36% faster than the Cubot Pocket 3, which got 209744. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Cubot Pocket 3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi 13C in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 389 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Pocket 3 which got 386, it is 0.78% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1379 vs 1371 (0.58% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi 13C and Cubot Pocket 3? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 13C (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 10.36% faster in the Antutu test (21733 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 compared to 20Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1170x480.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 13C (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket 3 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket 3 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
Xiaomi Redmi 13C related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 13 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 12 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 14C vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 vs Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Cubot Pocket 3 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket 3
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Echo
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot King Kong 3