Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 388446 | 78446 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 |
| Diagonal size | 6.39 " | 6.26 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 191 g | 181 g |
| Dimensions | 159,21 x 75,21 x 8,1 mm | 159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb: Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 SE - Compare |
126.95€ ($145.59) See Details |
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro’s camera vs Nokia 3.2’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Nokia 3.2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb | Nokia 3.2 2/16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 388446 score points which is 395.18% faster than the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB, which got 78446. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb vs Nokia 3.2 2/16GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 732 points score in "Single-core" of against the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB which got 167, it is 338.32% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2129 vs 546 (289.93% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb and Nokia 3.2 2/16GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 395.18% faster in the Antutu test (310000 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1520x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 10 grams less (181 vs 191).
Why it is better not to take Nokia 3.2 2/16GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro 8/256Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro Global
- Compare Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro
Nokia 3.2 2/16GB related comparisons
- Compare Nokia 7 Plus vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C2
- Compare Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia C1
- Compare Nokia G21 vs Nokia 3.2
- Compare Nokia X6 vs Nokia 3.2