0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 with A9 IP68.

Name Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 A9 IP68
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 A9 IP68
Antutu benchmark 1836443
CPU MediaTek Dimensity 8400
Diagonal size 6.67 " "
Resolution 2712x1220 800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 12 Gb Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 256 GB 8 GB
External memory No
Rear camera 50 Mp Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model Sony LYT600
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 20 Mp Mp
Battery 6550 mAh 3000 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 15
Material Plastic frame and glass case
Weight 203 g g
Dimensions 160.95 x 75.24 x 8.06 mm mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4:
Xiaomi Redmi 10C 4/64GB NFC - Compare
Xiaomi Black Shark 6/64Gb - Compare
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 8/256GB - Compare
Discontinued. View all A9 models here
Alternatives to the A9 IP68:

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4’s camera vs A9 IP68’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 A9 IP68
Rear camera 50 Mp Mp
Sensor model Sony LYT600
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 20 Mp Mp
Flash No

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 A9 IP68
Battery 6550 mAh 3000 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging Yes
Wireless charging No

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68: Antutu benchmark comparison. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1836443 score points which is 100.00% faster than the A9 IP68, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
6.67 inches (2712x1220) Curved Glass / Dimensity 8400 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony LYT600 / 6550mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
145.46€
$169.24
 

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs A9 IP68: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1811 points score in "Single-core" of against the A9 IP68 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6688 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
6.67 inches (2712x1220) Curved Glass / Dimensity 8400 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony LYT600 / 6550mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
145.46€
$169.24
 

What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and A9 IP68? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (advantages)

  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2712x1220 vs 800x480.
  • More battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 3550mAh).
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have infrared blaster supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the A9 IP68 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take A9 IP68 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have fast charging support
  • Does not have infrared blaster supports.

The advantages of both models

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 related comparisons

A9 IP68 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons