Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Cubot S168
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1836443 | |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | MediaTek MT6582 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6550 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | |
| Weight | 203 g | g |
| Dimensions | 160.95 x 75.24 x 8.06 mm | mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G NE 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi 12S Ultra 12/256GB Chinese version - Compare Xiaomi 11T Pro 8/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot P50 - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6550 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1836443 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1811 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6688 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony LYT600 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2712x1220 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 4650mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Apple iPhone 16
Cubot S168 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Nokia X6
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite