Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 with ECOO E04.
Name	Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4	ECOO E04

Antutu benchmark	1836443
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 8400	MediaTek MT6572
Diagonal size	6.67 "	5.5 "
Resolution	2712x1220	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	12 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	256 GB	16 GB
External memory	No
Rear camera	50 Mp	16 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony LYT600
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	6550 mAh	2500 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	5 G	G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 15
Material	Plastic frame and glass case
Weight	203 g	160 g
Dimensions	160.95 x 75.24 x 8.06 mm	156.7 x 77.5 x 9.3 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4: Xiaomi 12T Pro Daniel Arsham Edition - Compare Xiaomi Poco X6 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 9C 3/64GB - Compare	Discontinued. View all ECOO models here Alternatives to the ECOO E04:

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4’s camera vs ECOO E04’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4	ECOO E04
Rear camera	50 Mp	16 Mp
Sensor model	Sony LYT600
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4	ECOO E04
Battery	6550 mAh	2500 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1836443 score points which is 100.00% faster than the ECOO E04, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4

6.67 inches (2712x1220) Curved Glass / Dimensity 8400 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony LYT600 / 6550mAh

On Sale Soon

1836443

ECOO E04

5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6572 / 3Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs ECOO E04: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1811 points score in "Single-core" of against the ECOO E04 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6688 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4

6.67 inches (2712x1220) Curved Glass / Dimensity 8400 / 12Gb / 256GB / 50Mp Sony LYT600 / 6550mAh

On Sale Soon

1811 / 6688

ECOO E04

5.5" (1920x1080) / MT6572 / 3Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and ECOO E04? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony LYT600 compared to 16Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2712x1220 vs 1920x1080.
More battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 4050mAh).
Have water resistant supports.
Have fast charging supports.
Have infrared blaster supports.

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the ECOO E04 (advantages)

Best weight: 43 grams less (160 vs 203).
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take ECOO E04 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.
Does not have fast charging support
Does not have infrared blaster supports.

The advantages of both models

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 related comparisons

ECOO E04 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons