Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs InFocus M320U
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | InFocus M320U |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 1836443 | |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | MediaTek MT6592 |
| Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | No | |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 6550 mAh | 3100 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | |
| Weight | 203 g | g |
| Dimensions | 160.95 x 75.24 x 8.06 mm | mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4: Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G NE 8/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40S 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold 2 12/512GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all InFocus models here
Alternatives to the InFocus M320U: |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs InFocus M320U: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4’s camera vs InFocus M320U’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | InFocus M320U |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs InFocus M320U: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs InFocus M320U, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | InFocus M320U |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6550 mAh | 3100 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging | No |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs InFocus M320U: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1836443 score points which is 100.00% faster than the InFocus M320U, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs InFocus M320U: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1811 points score in "Single-core" of against the InFocus M320U which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6688 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and InFocus M320U? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 50Mp Sony LYT600 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2712x1220 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 3100mAh (a difference of 3450mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the InFocus M320U (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take InFocus M320U (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Apple iPhone 16
InFocus M320U related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Ref
- Compare Apple iPhone 6s Ref vs Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Ref
- Compare CUBE ALLDOCUBE M5 vs TECLAST M20
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Ref
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Meizu M8 Lite