Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco C65
Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 1836443 | 217622 |
CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | MediaTek Helio G85 |
Diagonal size | 6.67 " | 6.74 " |
Resolution | 2712x1220 | 1600x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 6 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 6550 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | No | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 15 | Android 13 |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 203 g | 192 g |
Dimensions | 160.95 x 75.24 x 8.06 mm | 168 x 78 x 8.09 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4: Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro 6/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Poco C65 - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 12 4/128GB NFC - Compare |
106.89€ ($125.65) See Details |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4’s camera vs Xiaomi Poco C65’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Sony LYT600 sensor and the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 50 Mp | 50 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony LYT600 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco C65, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 | Xiaomi Poco C65 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 6550 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 1836443 score points which is 743.87% faster than the Xiaomi Poco C65, which got 217622. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco C65: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1811 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Poco C65 which got 379, it is 377.84% faster. In "Multi-core" score 6688 vs 1378 (385.34% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 and Xiaomi Poco C65? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 743.87% faster in the Antutu test (1618821 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2712x1220 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 1550mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Poco C65 (advantages)
- Best weight: 11 grams less (192 vs 203).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Poco C65 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Apple iPhone 16
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 3
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 4 vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco C65 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco C65 vs Realme C55
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 13C vs Xiaomi Poco C65
- Compare Xiaomi Poco M5 vs Xiaomi Poco C65