0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

UNISOC Tiger T612 vs Allwinner A133

We compared the performance of processors and found out that UNISOC Tiger T612 is better than Allwinner A133 by 292.47%. It has 8 cores at 1.8 GHz and an Mali-G57MP GPU versus 4 cores at 1.6 GHz with PowerVR GE8300. In the Antutu Benchmark test, UNISOC Tiger T612 results were faster than Allwinner A133 by 257.90%, scoring 231893 points vs 64793 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 448 points against 97 , which is 361.86% higher.

Its disadvantage is a TDP of 10W (its competitor has 6W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks.

In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.

UNISOC Tiger T612 vs Allwinner A133 Benchmarks and Rankings

Benchmark UNISOC Tiger T612 Allwinner A133 Difference
Antutu 231893 64793 257.90%
Geekbench 1281/357 332/98 285.84% / 264.29%
3Dmark 448 97 361.86%

UNISOC Tiger T612 vs Allwinner A133 Gaming Performance Test

Gaming test UNISOC Tiger T612 Allwinner A133 Difference
PUBG: Mobile 41 fps 22 fps 86.36%
PUBG: New State 33 fps 11 fps 200.00%
Call of Duty: Mobile 36 fps 19 fps 89.47%
Fortnite 16 fps 0 fps +Inf%
Genshin Impact 20 fps 8 fps 150.00%
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 46 fps 20 fps 130.00%

UNISOC Tiger T612 vs Allwinner A133 Specification

Processor name UNISOC Tiger T612 Allwinner A133
Release Date 1/20/2022 10/25/2020
CPU Architecture 2 x Cortex-A75 1.8GHz + 6 x Cortex-A55 1.8GHz 4 x Cortex-A53 1.6 GHz
Number of Cores 8 4
Clock Rate 1.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Chip technology 12 nm 12 nm
GPU Mali-G57MP PowerVR GE8300
The highest TDP 10 6
Memory 6 Gb 4 Gb
Features UNISOC modem
Upload Speed (up to) 150 Mbps Mbps