Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G35
We compared the performance of processors and found out that Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is better than MediaTek Helio G35 by 25.91%. It has 8 cores at 1.8 GHz and an Adreno 506 GPU versus 8 cores at 2.3 GHz with PowerVR GE8320. In the 3DMark test, it scored 170 points against 119 , which is 42.86% higher.
Its disadvantage is a TDP of 7W (its competitor has 5W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modems is identical (150 Mbps), so you won't notice a difference in your Internet connection.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G35 Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | MediaTek Helio G35 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 113448 | 131844 | 16.22% |
Geekbench | 1233/271 | 993/180 | 24.17% / 50.56% |
3Dmark | 170 | 119 | 42.86% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G35 Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | MediaTek Helio G35 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 39 fps | 26 fps | 50.00% |
PUBG: New State | 28 fps | 22 fps | 27.27% |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 37 fps | 33 fps | 12.12% |
Fortnite | 12 fps | 9 fps | 33.33% |
Genshin Impact | 14 fps | 11 fps | 27.27% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 39 fps | 30 fps | 30.00% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Helio G35 Specification
Processor name | Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 6/26/2018 | 6/30/2020 |
CPU Architecture | 4 x1.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4 x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 | 8 x 2.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 |
Number of Cores | 8 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 1.8 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
Chip technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
GPU | Adreno 506 | PowerVR GE8320 |
The highest TDP | 7 | 5 |
Memory | 8 Gb | 6 Gb |
Features | Snapdragon X9 | MediaTek modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 150 Mbps | 150 Mbps |