Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio P65
We compared the performance of processors and found out that Samsung Exynos 9611 is better than MediaTek Helio P65 by 7.44%. It has 8 cores at 2.3 GHz and an Mali-G72MP GPU versus 8 cores at 2 GHz with Mali G52MP. In the 3DMark test, it scored 778 points against 573 , which is 35.78% higher.
Its disadvantage is a TDP of 8W (its competitor has 5W), which means devices based on this chip will heat up more during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in Samsung Exynos 9611 is better, 150 Mbps vs 100 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio P65 Benchmarks and Rankings
Benchmark | Samsung Exynos 9611 | MediaTek Helio P65 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Antutu | 180933 | 181557 | 0.34% |
Geekbench | 1237/352 | 1285/359 | 3.88% / 1.99% |
3Dmark | 778 | 573 | 35.78% |
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio P65 Gaming Performance Test
Gaming test | Samsung Exynos 9611 | MediaTek Helio P65 | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
PUBG: Mobile | 40 fps | 40 fps | - |
PUBG: New State | 33 fps | 34 fps | 3.03% |
Call of Duty: Mobile | 42 fps | 42 fps | - |
Fortnite | 16 fps | 21 fps | 31.25% |
Genshin Impact | 19 fps | 18 fps | 5.56% |
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 43 fps | 53 fps | 23.26% |
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio P65 Specification
Processor name | Samsung Exynos 9611 | MediaTek Helio P65 |
---|---|---|
Release Date | 9/10/2019 | 6/10/2019 |
CPU Architecture | 4 x ARM Cortex-A73 2,3 Ghz + 4 x ARM Cortex-A53 1,7 Ghz | 2 x ARM Cortex-A75 2GHz + 6 x ARM Cortex-A55 1.7GHz |
Number of Cores | 8 | 8 |
Clock Rate | 2.3 GHz | 2 GHz |
Chip technology | 10 nm | 12 nm |
GPU | Mali-G72MP | Mali G52MP |
The highest TDP | 8 | 5 |
Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
Features | Shannon 337 | MediaTek modem |
Upload Speed (up to) | 150 Mbps | 100 Mbps |