UNISOC SC9832A vs UNISOC SC8825
We compared the performance of processors and found out that UNISOC SC9832A is better than UNISOC SC8825 by 407.41%. It has 4 cores at 1.3 GHz and an Mali 400MP GPU versus 2 cores at 1.2 GHz with Mali 400MP. In the Antutu Benchmark test, UNISOC SC9832A results were faster than UNISOC SC8825 by 132.49%, scoring 34588 points vs 14877 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 49 points against 27 , which is 81.48% higher.
The chips have equal TDP of 5W, which means that devices based on these CPUs will heat up the same during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in UNISOC SC9832A is better, 50 Mbps vs 10 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service.
In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you.
UNISOC SC9832A vs UNISOC SC8825 Benchmarks and Rankings
| Benchmark | UNISOC SC9832A | UNISOC SC8825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antutu | 34588 | 14877 | 132.49% |
| Geekbench | 427/123 | 38/25 | 1023.68% / 392.00% |
| 3Dmark | 49 | 27 | 81.48% |
UNISOC SC9832A vs UNISOC SC8825 Gaming Performance Test
| Gaming test | UNISOC SC9832A | UNISOC SC8825 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUBG: Mobile | 22 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
| PUBG: New State | 15 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 19 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
| Fortnite | 3 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
| Genshin Impact | 3 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 19 fps | 0 fps | +Inf% |
UNISOC SC9832A vs UNISOC SC8825 Specification
| Processor name | UNISOC SC9832A | UNISOC SC8825 |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | 4/10/2016 | 2/10/2013 |
| CPU Architecture | 4 x Cortex-A7 1,3 GHz | 2 x Cortex-A5 1,2 GHz |
| Number of Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Clock Rate | 1.3 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Chip technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| GPU | Mali 400MP | Mali 400MP |
| The highest TDP | 5 | 5 |
| Memory | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Features | UNISOC modem | UNISOC modem |
| Upload Speed (up to) | 50 Mbps | 10 Mbps |