OUKITEL C62 Review: specs and features, camera quality test, gaming benchmark, user opinions and photos

OUKITEL C62 - funny copying

The Chinese company Oukitel started the second half of the year with a crazy number of new products, which, unfortunately, are quite monotonous and not always endowed with competitive advantages. So, the hero of today's review, in addition to the lack of significant advantages, also surprises with noticeable plagiarism in terms of design.

Externally, the device is very similar to the flagship Samsung Galaxy phones. A similar block of photo modules causes controversial emotions, especially considering that as many as four modules are either fake or 0.3-megapixel, practically useless. The design of the 5-megapixel selfie camera is outdated, the plastic used in the case design is very cheap. But there are also advantages. This is a stylish additional 1.81-inch IPS display for displaying time and notifications, and a variety of colors of the rear panels, and a side fingerprint sensor. The main 6.88-inch IPS screen has a positive aspect with a 90 Hz refresh rate and more or less realistic color rendering. But the situation with the maximum brightness reserve is bad (about 450 nits), and the picture clarity is mediocre due to the HD+ resolution.

The technical characteristics include the UNISOC Tiger T606 processor, 4 GB of RAM and the Mali G57-MC1 video accelerator. This bundle has already become standard for the price segment, so it is problematic to praise or scold it. The Android 15 interface is rendered without serious lags, but the gaming capabilities are not particularly pleasing. It is recommended to avoid demanding games, but simple 3D graphics projects like PUBG Mobile will work with low graphics settings. ROM is allocated 128 GB, it is allowed to expand it with MicroSD cards.

In fact, only one 13-megapixel sensor of low quality is responsible for photographic capabilities. It has autofocus and LED flash, thanks to which it will be possible to capture the text of documents. But artistic photography, even in good lighting, disappoints with numerous noises, blurs, errors in color rendering. The sound of one speaker is quiet and inexpressive, and we will also note the lack of contactless NFC payments. Thus, before us is another uninteresting inexpensive smartphone, which has more productive and functional alternatives in the cost category.