ZTE Blade 20 5G Review: specs and features, camera quality test, gaming benchmark, user opinions and photos

ZTE Blade 20 5G - insane savings

5G smartphones are incredibly popular this year. Surprisingly, even residents of those countries that do not have 5G towers and are not expected to buy a phone with the latest technology want to buy a phone. However, processors supporting such frequencies are not cheap, so manufacturers have to go to various tricks to reduce the cost of the final product. Unfortunately, the Chinese company ZTE has gone too far.

The design of the novelty is not bad, but it is not devoid of a number of controversial features. So, the design of the front - facing 8-megapixel camera is noticeably outdated, and the body itself is made of inexpensive glossy plastic, which is ready to quickly become covered with scratches, chips and prints. At the same time, the back panel looks beautiful thanks to a triple photo module and a fingerprint sensor. The 6.52-inch OGS screen isn't perfect either. On the one hand, it has enough brightness and contrast for most scenarios, on the other hand, the resolution of 1560x720 pixels has nothing to do with the clarity of the displayed image.

It should be noted that such a display minus still has a positive effect on performance and autonomy. Technical characteristics in the face of the Mediatek Dimensity 720 CPU , 6GB of RAM and the Mali G57MC3 video adapter will not leave the user without modern games at medium-high graphics settings. There are no complaints about the amount of internal memory, which has reached 128GB . There is also a slot for microSD cards .

But the photographic possibilities are disappointing. Forget about high-tech 48- and 64-megapixel modules, the main cameras are simple 16-, 8- and 2-megapixel sensors, with which only high-quality daytime shooting is possible. Deterioration of lighting seriously reduces the amount of detail, negatively affects color rendering, and numerous noise appears. There are no NFC contactless payments, stereo speakers important for millions of people. Android Q and a 4000mAh battery (about 8-9 hours of active screen time), coupled with the aforementioned advantages, are not able to divert attention from the gadget's shortcomings. As a result, it is impossible to unambiguously recommend the considered device for purchase.