Compare AGM M2 vs Landvo L200G (4G)
Name | AGM M2 | Landvo L200G (4G) |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | ||
CPU | UNISOC 6531D | |
Diagonal size | 2.4 " | " |
Resolution | 320x240 | 960x540 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | GB | 4 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
Battery | 1950 mAh | 2000 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 2 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | No | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | ||
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | ||
Material | Plastics and rubber | |
Weight | 138 g | g |
Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM Glory G1S - Compare AGM A9 4/32Gb - Compare AGM A10 3/32Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Landvo models here
Alternatives to the Landvo L200G (4G): |
AGM M2 vs Landvo L200G (4G): Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs Landvo L200G (4G)’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | AGM M2 | Landvo L200G (4G) |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | No | |
Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
Flash |
AGM M2 vs Landvo L200G (4G): battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs Landvo L200G (4G), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | AGM M2 | Landvo L200G (4G) |
---|---|---|
Battery | 1950 mAh | 2000 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
Talk time | 25 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs Landvo L200G (4G): Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Landvo L200G (4G), which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs Landvo L200G (4G): Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Landvo L200G (4G) which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and Landvo L200G (4G)? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Landvo L200G (4G) (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 960x540 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 2000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 50mAh).
Why it is better not to take Landvo L200G (4G) (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Stone V3 Plus vs AGM M2
Landvo L200G (4G) related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs KEECOO P11 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs OUKITEL WP5000
- Compare HomTom HT70 vs Xiaomi MI6
- Compare HomTom HT70 vs OUKITEL K7 Power
- Compare OUKITEL WP5000 vs OUKITEL WP1