Compare Samsung Galaxy F62 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 441275 | 65331 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 9825 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 6.7 " | 5.99 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2160x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 8.1 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 218 g | 251 g |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm | 168 x 81,4 x 12,6 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy F62: Samsung Galaxy S10 8/128Gb - Compare Samsung Galaxy A14 5G - Compare Samsung Galaxy A73 5G 8/256GB - Compare |
95.47€ ($112.68) See Details |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy F62’s camera vs AGM A9’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 12 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX486 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 13 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy F62 vs AGM A9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy F62 | AGM A9 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 441275 score points which is 575.45% faster than the AGM A9 4/64Gb, which got 65331. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs AGM A9 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy F62 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 768 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM A9 4/64Gb which got 146, it is 426.03% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2387 vs 146 (1534.93% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy F62 and AGM A9 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy F62 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 575.45% faster in the Antutu test (375944 score difference).
- Best weight: 33 grams less (218 vs 251).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 2160x1080.
- More battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5400mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy F62 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM A9 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 13Mp .
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM A9 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Samsung Galaxy F62 related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M62 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M51 vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M31S vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy F62
- Compare Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy F62
AGM A9 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 Ceramic vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X2 SE vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 3 vs AGM A9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 6 vs AGM A9
- Compare AGM X3 vs AGM A9