Compare Cubot J9 vs AGM M2
Name | Cubot J9 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 23177 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | UNISOC 6531D |
Diagonal size | 6.21 " | 2.4 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 320x240 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 2 | |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | |
ROM | 16 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 3 G | 2 G |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | g | 138 g |
Dimensions | mm | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm |
Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot J9: Cubot Note 30 - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM Glory G1 SE - Compare AGM Glory G1 - Compare AGM H MAX - Compare |
Cubot J9 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot J9’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot J9 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | No |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot J9 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot J9 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot J9 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No |
Cubot J9 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot J9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 23177 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot J9 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot J9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 65 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 222 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot J9 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J9 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 1.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 2050mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot J9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot J9 related comparisons
- Compare Leagoo M11 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 7 Global vs Cubot J9
- Compare OUKITEL C16 vs Cubot J9
- Compare Cubot J9 vs Nokia 2.3
- Compare Cubot X19S vs Cubot J9
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2