Compare AGM M2 vs Rover X9
| Name | AGM M2 | Rover X9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | ||
| CPU | UNISOC 6531D | UNISOC 6531D |
| Diagonal size | 2.4 " | 3.5 " |
| Resolution | 320x240 | 320x480 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 1 | |
| RAM | Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 2 G | 2 G |
| WiFi | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | ||
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
| Operating system (OS) | ||
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 138 g | 248 g |
| Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | 126 x 66 x 22 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM M5 - Compare AGM Glory G1 SE - Compare AGM H5 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Rover models here
Alternatives to the Rover X9: |
AGM M2 vs Rover X9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs Rover X9’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the 0.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM M2 | Rover X9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | No | No |
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Flash |
AGM M2 vs Rover X9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs Rover X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM M2 | Rover X9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 1500 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | No | No |
| Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs Rover X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Rover X9, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs Rover X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Rover X9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and Rover X9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 110 grams less (138 vs 248).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 1.3Mp compared to 0.3Mp
- More battery capacity: 1950mAh vs 1500mAh (a difference of 450mAh).
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Rover X9 (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 320x480 vs 320x240.
Why it is better not to take Rover X9 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Stone V3 Plus vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2