Compare Cubot P40 vs AGM M2

Cubot P40 vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot P40 with AGM M2.
Name	Cubot P40	AGM M2

Antutu benchmark	62117
CPU	MediaTek Helio A22	UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size	6.2 "	2.4 "
Resolution	1520x720	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10
RAM	4 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	Yes
ROM	128 GB	GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	12 Mp	1.3 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX488
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	Mp
Battery	4200 mAh	1950 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Metal frame and plastic case	Plastics and rubber
Weight	184 g	138 g
Dimensions	155 x 73 x 10 mm	139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
Price	150.64€ ($161.13) See Details	Discontinued. View all AGM models here Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM A10 6/128Gb - Compare AGM H3 - Compare AGM X3 6/64Gb - Compare

Cubot P40 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot P40’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX488 sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot P40	AGM M2
Rear camera	12 Mp	1.3 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX488
Flash	Dual LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	Mp
Flash	No

Cubot P40 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot P40 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot P40	AGM M2
Battery	4200 mAh	1950 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	3-4 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot P40 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot P40 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 62117 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot P40

6.2 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio A22 / 4Gb / 128GB / 12Mp Sony IMX488 / 4200mAh

150.64€

$161.13

62117

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Cubot P40 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot P40 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 152 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 393 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot P40

6.2 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio A22 / 4Gb / 128GB / 12Mp Sony IMX488 / 4200mAh

150.64€

$161.13

152 / 393

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot P40 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P40 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp Sony IMX488 compared to 1.3Mp
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 2250mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot P40 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

Best weight: 46 grams less (138 vs 184).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot P40 related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.20/5 of 54

Frequent comparisons