0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare LG K9 vs AGM M2

LG K9 vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of LG K9 with AGM M2.

Name LG K9 AGM M2
LG K9 AGM M2
Antutu benchmark 48765
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size 5 " 2.4 "
Resolution 1280x720 320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10
RAM 2 Gb Gb
Bezel-less No
ROM 16 GB GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 1.3 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp Mp
Battery 2500 mAh 1950 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 2 G
WiFi Yes No
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner No No
Operating system (OS) Android 7.1
Material Plastic Plastics and rubber
Weight 152 g 138 g
Dimensions 146,3 x 73,2 x 8,2 mm 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
  Price 90.00€ ($94.92) See Details Discontinued. View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2:
AGM H5 - Compare
AGM Glory G1 - Compare
AGM A10 4/64Gb - Compare

LG K9 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the LG K9’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name LG K9 AGM M2
Rear camera 8 Mp 1.3 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash No
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp Mp
Flash No

LG K9 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the LG K9 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name LG K9 AGM M2
Battery 2500 mAh 1950 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No

LG K9 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison. LG K9 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

LG K9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 48765 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

LG K9
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 210 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2500mAh
90.00€
$94.92
 
AGM M2
2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

LG K9 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

LG K9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 96 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 336 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

LG K9
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 210 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2500mAh
90.00€
$94.92
 
AGM M2
2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between LG K9 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the LG K9 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 1.3Mp
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
  • More battery capacity: 2500mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 550mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take LG K9 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 14 grams less (138 vs 152).
  • Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

LG K9 related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons