Compare Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2

Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Motorola Moto G Pro with AGM M2.
Name	Motorola Moto G Pro	AGM M2

Antutu benchmark	151778
CPU	Qualcomm Snapdragon 665	UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size	6.4 "	2.4 "
Resolution	2300x1080	320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10
RAM	4 Gb	Gb
Bezel-less	Yes
ROM	128 GB	GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	1.3 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	Mp
Battery	4000 mAh	1950 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	2 G
WiFi	Yes	No
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic	Plastics and rubber
Weight	192 g	138 g
Dimensions	158.6 x 75.8 x 9.2 mm	139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
Price	196.00€ ($224.92) See Details	Discontinued. View all AGM models here Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM A10 3/32Gb - Compare AGM H MAX - Compare AGM H5 - Compare

Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Motorola Moto G Pro’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Motorola Moto G Pro	AGM M2
Rear camera	48 Mp	1.3 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash	No
Front (selfie) camera	20 Mp	Mp
Flash	Double LED

Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Motorola Moto G Pro	AGM M2
Battery	4000 mAh	1950 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No

Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Motorola Moto G Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 151778 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Motorola Moto G Pro

6.4" (2300x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 665 / 4Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4000mAh

196.00€

$224.92

151778

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Motorola Moto G Pro vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Motorola Moto G Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 314 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1393 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Motorola Moto G Pro

6.4" (2300x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 665 / 4Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 4000mAh

196.00€

$224.92

314 / 1393

AGM M2

2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Motorola Moto G Pro and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Motorola Moto G Pro (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 1.3Mp
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2300x1080 vs 320x240.
More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 2050mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Motorola Moto G Pro (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

Best weight: 54 grams less (138 vs 192).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Motorola Moto G Pro related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.57/5 of 7

Frequent comparisons