Compare AGM M2 vs NO.1 A9
| Name | AGM M2 | NO.1 A9 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | ||
| CPU | UNISOC 6531D | |
| Diagonal size | 2.4 " | 2.4 " |
| Resolution | 320x240 | 320x240 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
| RAM | Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 3 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 2 G | 2 G |
| WiFi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | ||
| Notifications Led | No | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | ||
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 138 g | 206 g |
| Dimensions | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm | 137.4 x 64.4 x 26.8 mm |
| Price |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM Glory G1S - Compare AGM X3 8/64Gb - Compare AGM A9 4/64Gb - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all NO.1 models here
Alternatives to the NO.1 A9: |
AGM M2 vs NO.1 A9: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AGM M2’s camera vs NO.1 A9’s camera, see the difference between the 1.3Mp sensor and the 3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | AGM M2 | NO.1 A9 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 1.3 Mp | 3 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | No | |
| Front (selfie) camera | Mp | Mp |
| Flash |
AGM M2 vs NO.1 A9: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AGM M2 vs NO.1 A9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | AGM M2 | NO.1 A9 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 1950 mAh | 4800 mAh |
| Type | Removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 7-8 hours | |
| Talk time | 25 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging |
AGM M2 vs NO.1 A9: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 0 score points which is 100.00% faster than the NO.1 A9, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AGM M2 vs NO.1 A9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AGM M2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the NO.1 A9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AGM M2 and NO.1 A9? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 68 grams less (138 vs 206).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the NO.1 A9 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 3Mp compared to 1.3Mp
- More battery capacity: 4800mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 2850mAh).
Why it is better not to take NO.1 A9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2