0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb with AGM M2.

Name Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb AGM M2
Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb AGM M2
Antutu benchmark 110922
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 UNISOC 6531D
Diagonal size 6.3 " 2.4 "
Resolution 2340x1080 320x240
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10
RAM 4 Gb Gb
Bezel-less No
ROM 64 GB GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 1.3 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp Mp
Battery 3500 mAh 1950 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 2 G
WiFi Yes No
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes No
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastic frame and glass case Plastics and rubber
Weight 180 g 138 g
Dimensions 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm
  Price 244.99€ ($283.94) See Details Discontinued. View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2:
AGM A10 4/64Gb - Compare
AGM M7 - Compare
AGM Glory G1S - Compare

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 6.2’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb AGM M2
Rear camera 16 Mp 1.3 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash No
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp Mp
Flash No

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 6.2 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb AGM M2
Battery 3500 mAh 1950 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 7-8 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 110922 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 636 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3500mAh
244.99€
$283.94
 
AGM M2
2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 277 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1168 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb
6.3 inches (2340x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 636 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3500mAh
244.99€
$283.94
 
AGM M2
2.4 inches (320x240) Glass / 6531D / 1.3Mp / 1950mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 1.3Mp
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 320x240.
  • More battery capacity: 3500mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 1550mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 42 grams less (138 vs 180).
  • Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 6.2 4/64Gb related comparisons

AGM M2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.58/5 of 12
Frequent comparisons