Compare OUKITEL C22 vs AGM M2
Name | OUKITEL C22 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 78177 | |
CPU | MediaTek Helio A22 | UNISOC 6531D |
Diagonal size | 5.86 " | 2.4 " |
Resolution | 1520x720 | 320x240 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
RAM | 4 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 128 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4000 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | 2 G |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | g | 138 g |
Dimensions | mm | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all OUKITEL models here
Alternatives to the OUKITEL C22: OUKITEL WP5 Pro - Compare OUKITEL C16 Pro - Compare OUKITEL WP10 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM H MAX - Compare AGM M6 - Compare AGM H5 - Compare |
OUKITEL C22 vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the OUKITEL C22’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | OUKITEL C22 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | No |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
OUKITEL C22 vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the OUKITEL C22 vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | OUKITEL C22 | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4000 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No |
OUKITEL C22 vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C22 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 78177 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
OUKITEL C22 vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
OUKITEL C22 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 153 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 395 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between OUKITEL C22 and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the OUKITEL C22 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 1.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 2050mAh).
Why it is better not to take OUKITEL C22 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
OUKITEL C22 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL C21 vs OUKITEL C22
- Compare Apple iPhone 11 Pro vs OUKITEL C22
- Compare OUKITEL C21 Pro vs OUKITEL C22
- Compare Doogee N30 vs OUKITEL C22
- Compare Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max vs OUKITEL C22
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2