Compare AllCall Alpha vs AGM M2
Name | AllCall Alpha | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 19523 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | UNISOC 6531D |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 2.4 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 320x240 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 1 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 8 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX149 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 2300 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | 2 G |
WiFi | Yes | No |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | No | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
Material | Plastic | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 144 g | 138 g |
Dimensions | 144 x 71 x 7,9 mm | 139 x 56,8 x 16 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Alpha: |
Discontinued.
View all AGM models here
Alternatives to the AGM M2: AGM H3 - Compare AGM X3 6/64Gb - Compare AGM G2 - Compare |
AllCall Alpha vs AGM M2: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AllCall Alpha’s camera vs AGM M2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp Sony IMX149 sensor and the 1.3Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | AllCall Alpha | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 1.3 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX149 | |
Flash | LED flash | No |
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
AllCall Alpha vs AGM M2: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AllCall Alpha vs AGM M2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | AllCall Alpha | AGM M2 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2300 mAh | 1950 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 7-8 hours |
Talk time | 20 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging |
AllCall Alpha vs AGM M2: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AllCall Alpha in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 19523 score points which is 100.00% faster than the AGM M2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AllCall Alpha vs AGM M2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AllCall Alpha in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the AGM M2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AllCall Alpha and AGM M2? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Alpha (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp Sony IMX149 compared to 1.3Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 320x240.
- More battery capacity: 2300mAh vs 1950mAh (a difference of 350mAh).
Why it is better not to take AllCall Alpha (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AGM M2 (advantages)
- Best weight: 6 grams less (138 vs 144).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take AGM M2 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AllCall Alpha related comparisons
- Compare Uhans MX vs AllCall Alpha
- Compare Blackview A7 vs AllCall Alpha
- Compare Ulefone S8 Pro vs AllCall Alpha
- Compare AllCall Rio vs AllCall Alpha
- Compare BLUBOO D2 vs AllCall Alpha
AGM M2 related comparisons
- Compare Rover X9 vs AGM M2
- Compare Suppu X6000 vs AGM M2
- Compare VKworld Diamond Z2 vs AGM M2
- Compare Uniwa V708 vs AGM M2
- Compare BLUBOO Mini vs AGM M2