0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid

ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of ZTE Axon 30 with AllCall Madrid.

Name ZTE Axon 30 AllCall Madrid
ZTE Axon 30 AllCall Madrid
Antutu benchmark 673663 21557
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 6.92 " 5.5 "
Resolution 2460x1080 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 2
RAM 6 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 8 GB
External memory No MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Four cameras Dual Camera
Sensor model Sony IMX682
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 2 Mp
Battery 4200 mAh 2600 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 5 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes No
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 7.0
Material Metal frame and glass case Plastic
Weight g 180 g
Dimensions mm 154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm
  Price Notify me when it goes on sale. View all ZTE models here
Alternatives to the ZTE Axon 30:
ZTE Axon 40 Pro 12/256GB - Compare
ZTE Blade V40 Pro - Compare
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7s Pro 12/256GB Global Version - Compare
Discontinued. View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid:

ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the ZTE Axon 30’s camera vs AllCall Madrid’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name ZTE Axon 30 AllCall Madrid
Rear camera 64 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model Sony IMX682
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 2 Mp
Flash No No

ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name ZTE Axon 30 AllCall Madrid
Battery 4200 mAh 2600 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 4-5 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 30 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging No

ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison. ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison.

ZTE Axon 30 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 673663 score points which is 3025.03% faster than the AllCall Madrid, which got 21557. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

ZTE Axon 30
6.92 inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 870 / 6Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX682 / 4200mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
AllCall Madrid
5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

ZTE Axon 30 vs AllCall Madrid: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

ZTE Axon 30 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1011 points score in "Single-core" of against the AllCall Madrid which got 66, it is 1431.82% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3491 vs 229 (1424.45% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

ZTE Axon 30
6.92 inches (2460x1080) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 870 / 6Gb / 128GB / 64Mp Sony IMX682 / 4200mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 
AllCall Madrid
5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between ZTE Axon 30 and AllCall Madrid? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the ZTE Axon 30 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 3025.03% faster in the Antutu test (652106 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 8Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 2Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
  • More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 1600mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take ZTE Axon 30 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.
  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

ZTE Axon 30 related comparisons

AllCall Madrid related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.00/5 of 3
Frequent comparisons