Compare Blackview BV6900 vs THL W200S
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | THL W200S |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 94338 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 | |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
| RAM | 4 Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | 64 GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | |
| Weight | 284 g | g |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm | mm |
| Price | 109.99€ ($114.66) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all THL models here
Alternatives to the THL W200S: |
Blackview BV6900 vs THL W200S: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV6900’s camera vs THL W200S’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | THL W200S |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Flash | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs THL W200S: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV6900 vs THL W200S, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | THL W200S |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV6900 vs THL W200S: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 94338 score points which is 100.00% faster than the THL W200S, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV6900 vs THL W200S: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 178 points score in "Single-core" of against the THL W200S which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 871 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV6900 and THL W200S? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the THL W200S (advantages)
Why it is better not to take THL W200S (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare HT F801C vs Blackview BV6900
THL W200S related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5C vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs LeEco Cool 1C
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5C vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Blackview R7