Compare Kenxinda V6 vs Cubot GT95
Name | Kenxinda V6 | Cubot GT95 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 16642 | |
CPU | UNISOC SC7731 | MediaTek MT6572W |
Diagonal size | 4.5 " | 4 " |
Resolution | 800x480 | 800x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 2 | 5 |
RAM | 1 Gb | 0.5 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
Battery | 1700 mAh | 1350 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 140 g | g |
Dimensions | 133 x 67,4 x 8,8 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Kenxinda models here
Alternatives to the Kenxinda V6: |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot GT95: Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot P50 - Compare Cubot X9 - Compare |
Kenxinda V6 vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Kenxinda V6’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 2Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Kenxinda V6 | Cubot GT95 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
Flash | No |
Kenxinda V6 vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Kenxinda V6 vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Kenxinda V6 | Cubot GT95 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 1700 mAh | 1350 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 4-5 days | |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 4-5 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Kenxinda V6 vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Kenxinda V6 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 16642 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Kenxinda V6 vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Kenxinda V6 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Kenxinda V6 and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kenxinda V6 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 2Mp vs 0.3Mp .
- More battery capacity: 1700mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 350mAh).
Why it is better not to take Kenxinda V6 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 5Mp compared to 2Mp
Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Kenxinda V6 related comparisons
- Compare HomTom HT16 vs Kenxinda V6
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs Vernee T3 Pro
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs UMIDIGI A3S
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs VKworld F1
- Compare Kenxinda V6 vs Apple iPhone 6s Ref
Cubot GT95 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Huawei Honor 6
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Xiaomi MI6
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 vs Xiaomi Mi A1
- Compare Huawei P10 Plus vs UMIDIGI S2 Pro
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Huawei P10 Plus