Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs HTM LANDVO L800
Name | Cubot King Kong CS | HTM LANDVO L800 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | |
Diagonal size | 5 " | " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 16 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 220 g | g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot King Kong 7 8/128GB - Compare Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare Cubot X20 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all HTM models here
Alternatives to the HTM LANDVO L800: |
Cubot King Kong CS vs HTM LANDVO L800: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs HTM LANDVO L800’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong CS | HTM LANDVO L800 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong CS vs HTM LANDVO L800: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs HTM LANDVO L800, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong CS | HTM LANDVO L800 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Cubot King Kong CS vs HTM LANDVO L800: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the HTM LANDVO L800, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong CS vs HTM LANDVO L800: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the HTM LANDVO L800 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and HTM LANDVO L800? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the HTM LANDVO L800 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take HTM LANDVO L800 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS
HTM LANDVO L800 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs OUKITEL U20 Plus
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs Doogee X5 Max Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U20 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus