Compare Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Cubot King Kong CS
Name | Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 589113 | 21244 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 6.44 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
RAM | 12 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4200 mAh | 4400 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 5 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
Weight | 209 g | 220 g |
Dimensions | 159 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play: Oppo Find X6 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Oppo Reno7 5G CN 8/256GB - Compare Oppo Reno8 5G 12/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot Note 30 - Compare Cubot King Kong - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare |
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play | Cubot King Kong CS |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4200 mAh | 4400 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 589113 score points which is 2673.08% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 904 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 1406.67% faster. In "Multi-core" score 3315 vs 249 (1231.33% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2673.08% faster in the Antutu test (567869 score difference).
- Best weight: 11 grams less (209 vs 220).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp Sony IMX471 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4200mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play related comparisons
- Compare OnePlus 8 vs Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Exclusive vs Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play
- Compare Oppo Find X2 vs Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play
- Compare Vivo IQOO 3 vs Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play
- Compare Oppo Realme X50 Pro Play vs Oppo Reno Ace 2
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS