Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Cubot King Kong CS
| Name | Oppo Reno 4F | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 206923 | 21244 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P95 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.43 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 164 g | 220 g |
| Dimensions | 160.14 x 73.7 x 7.48 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Oppo models here
Alternatives to the Oppo Reno 4F: Oppo Reno8 5G 12/256GB - Compare Oppo Reno7 5G CN 8/256GB - Compare Oppo A2 Pro - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot X9 - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare Cubot Note 8 - Compare |
Oppo Reno 4F vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Oppo Reno 4F’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX586 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Oppo Reno 4F | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX586 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Oppo Reno 4F vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Oppo Reno 4F vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Oppo Reno 4F | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Oppo Reno 4F vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno 4F in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 206923 score points which is 874.03% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Oppo Reno 4F vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Oppo Reno 4F in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 403 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 571.67% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1485 vs 249 (496.39% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Oppo Reno 4F and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Oppo Reno 4F (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 874.03% faster in the Antutu test (185679 score difference).
- Best weight: 56 grams less (164 vs 220).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX586 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Oppo Reno 4F (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Oppo Reno 4F related comparisons
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Oppo A95
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Realme 8
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- Compare Oppo Reno 4F vs Oppo A54 4G
- Compare Oppo A93 vs Oppo Reno 4F
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS