Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot GT95
Name | Cubot King Kong | Cubot GT95 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6572W |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 4 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 800x480 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 0.5 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 4 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | 1350 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 220 g | g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | mm |
Price | 98.85€ ($106.44) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot GT95: Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare |
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong | Cubot GT95 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 0.3 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong | Cubot GT95 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | 1350 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 0.3Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 800x480.
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 3050mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong
Cubot GT95 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Huawei Honor 6
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4A vs Xiaomi MI6
- Compare Xiaomi MI6 vs Xiaomi Mi A1
- Compare Huawei P10 Plus vs UMIDIGI S2 Pro
- Compare Elephone S8 vs Huawei P10 Plus