Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot S168
| Name | Cubot King Kong | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6582 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 3 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
| Material | Plastic | |
| Weight | 220 g | g |
| Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | mm |
| Price | 99.78€ ($106.44) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot P60 - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare |
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot King Kong | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot King Kong | Cubot S168 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 1900 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong
Cubot S168 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Nokia X6
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite