Compare Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A

Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong with Xiaomi Redmi 3A.
Name	Cubot King Kong	Xiaomi Redmi 3A

Antutu benchmark	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4400 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	3 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0	Android 5.1
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	220 g	g
Dimensions	154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm	139,3 x 69,6 x 8,5 mm
Price	91.11€ ($106.44) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 3A: Xiaomi Black Shark 4 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 8/256GB - Compare Xiaomi Mix Fold 3 12/256GB - Compare

Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong	Xiaomi Redmi 3A
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong	Xiaomi Redmi 3A
Battery	4400 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging

Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 3A, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

91.11€

$106.44

21244

Xiaomi Redmi 3A

5" (1280x720) / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

Cubot King Kong vs Xiaomi Redmi 3A: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 3A which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

91.11€

$106.44

72 / 258

Xiaomi Redmi 3A

5" (1280x720) / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and Xiaomi Redmi 3A? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)

More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 3A (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 3A (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot King Kong related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi 3A related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.56/5 of 71

Frequent comparisons