0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Vernee Thor 3/16Gb with Cubot R9.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Cubot R9
Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Cubot R9
Antutu benchmark 37524 21774
CPU MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5 " 5 "
Resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 3 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 2800 mAh 2600 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 4 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 6.0 Android 7.0
Material Metal and plastic Metal frame and plastic case
Weight 140 g 130 g
Dimensions 142 x 70.3 x 7.9 mm 144 x 72 x 7,9 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Vernee models here
Alternatives to the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb:
Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot R9:
Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare
Cubot P60 - Compare
Cubot Note 20 - Compare

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Vernee Thor’s camera vs Cubot R9’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Cubot R9
Rear camera 13 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vernee Thor vs Cubot R9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Vernee Thor 3/16Gb Cubot R9
Battery 2800 mAh 2600 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 5-6 hours 6-7 hours
Talk time 20 hours 25 hours
Fast charging Yes No
Wireless charging

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9: Antutu benchmark comparison. Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 37524 score points which is 72.33% faster than the Cubot R9, which got 21774. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot R9
5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2600mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb vs Cubot R9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 116 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot R9 which got 67, it is 73.13% faster. In "Multi-core" score 604 vs 225 (168.44% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb
5 inches (1280x720) Gorilla glass / MT6753 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2800mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot R9
5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2600mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Vernee Thor 3/16Gb and Cubot R9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 72.33% faster in the Antutu test (15750 score difference).
  • More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
  • Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Vernee Thor 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot R9 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 10 grams less (130 vs 140).

Why it is better not to take Cubot R9 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Vernee Thor 3/16Gb related comparisons

Cubot R9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.61/5 of 425
Frequent comparisons