Compare Cubot X16 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200
Name | Cubot X16 2/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 24869 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6735 | MediaTek MT6582 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | ||
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | ||
Fingerprint's scanner | ||
Operating system (OS) | ||
Material | Metal frame and glass case | |
Weight | 177 g | g |
Dimensions | 143.4 x 69.4 x 6.2 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X16 2/16Gb: Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare Cubot P60 - Compare Cubot X20 Pro - Compare |
42.43€ ($49.00) See Details |
Cubot X16 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot X16’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot X16 2/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash |
Cubot X16 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X16 vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot X16 2/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | ||
Battery Life | ||
Working hours in hard mode | ||
Talk time | ||
Fast charging | ||
Wireless charging |
Cubot X16 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot X16 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 24869 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot X16 2/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot X16 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot X16 2/16Gb and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X16 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X16 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 800mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot X16 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Gemini vs UMIDIGI C Note
- Compare Ulefone Gemini vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare Meizu M5S vs Ulefone Gemini
- Compare Ulefone Gemini vs Meizu M3 Note
- Compare Doogee Shoot 1 vs Ulefone Gemini
Cubot S200 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Micromax Selfie 3
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Pro