Compare Cubot X9 vs Cubot S208
| Name | Cubot X9 | Cubot S208 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 29637 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6592M | |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
| RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | 16 GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb | |
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX135 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 2200 mAh | mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 3 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 4.4 | |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | |
| Weight | 124 g | g |
| Dimensions | 143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm | mm |
| Price | 64.68€ ($69.00) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S208: Cubot S200 - Compare Cubot King Kong - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare |
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S208: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot X9’s camera vs Cubot S208’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot X9 | Cubot S208 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX135 | |
| Flash | LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
| Flash | No |
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S208: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X9 vs Cubot S208, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot X9 | Cubot S208 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 2200 mAh | mAh |
| Type | Removable | |
| Stand-by time | 4-5 days | |
| Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 4-5 hours | |
| Talk time | 20 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging |
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S208: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot X9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 29637 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S208, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot X9 vs Cubot S208: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot X9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S208 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot X9 and Cubot S208? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S208 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot S208 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Cubot X9 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Lenovo K5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 vs Cubot Quest
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite vs Lenovo K5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi POCOPHONE Poco F1 vs Lenovo K5 Pro
Cubot S208 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee BL7000 vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Doogee BL12000
- Compare Doogee BL12000 vs OUKITEL K7 Power
- Compare Doogee BL12000 vs Apple iPhone 7 Ref