Compare Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600

Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot X9 with Cubot S600.
Name	Cubot X9	Cubot S600

Antutu benchmark	29637	23500
CPU	MediaTek MT6592M	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	16 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	2200 mAh	2700 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	3 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 4.4	Android 5.1
Material	Metal frame and plastic case	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	124 g	146 g
Dimensions	143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm	146.5 x 71.3 x 7.5 mm
Price	59.74€ ($69.00) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S600: Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare

Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot X9’s camera vs Cubot S600’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot X9	Cubot S600
Rear camera	13 Mp	16 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot X9	Cubot S600
Battery	2200 mAh	2700 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	4-5 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	4-5 hours
Talk time	20 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging

Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot X9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 29637 score points which is 26.11% faster than the Cubot S600, which got 23500. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

59.74€

$69.00

29637

Cubot S600

5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2700mAh

93.54€

$108.03

23500

Cubot X9 vs Cubot S600: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot X9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S600 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

59.74€

$69.00

0 / 0

Cubot S600

5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2700mAh

93.54€

$108.03

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot X9 and Cubot S600? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 26.11% faster in the Antutu test (6137 score difference).
Best weight: 22 grams less (124 vs 146).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S600 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp Sony IMX135
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
More battery capacity: 2700mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 500mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot S600 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot X9 related comparisons

Cubot S600 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.60/5 of 50

Frequent comparisons