Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 313177 | 105966 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G95 | MediaTek Helio P22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 1520x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 8280 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 350 g | 330 g |
| Dimensions | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm | 168 × 81 × 17 mm |
| Price | 175.05€ ($203.20) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB: |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Hotwav CYBER 8’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Four LEDs | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 8, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | IIIF150 R2022 | Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8300 mAh | 8280 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 195.54% faster than the Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB, which got 105966. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB which got 154, it is 177.27% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 752 (106.12% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 195.54% faster in the Antutu test (207211 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 8Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1520x720.
- More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 8280mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 20 grams less (330 vs 350).
Why it is better not to take Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT
Hotwav CYBER 8 8/128GB related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro vs Hotwav CYBER 8
- Compare Hotwav CYBER 7 5G vs Hotwav CYBER 8
- Compare Hotwav CYBER 8 vs Hotwav H1
- Compare Hotwav CYBER 8 vs Hotwav CYBER 8
- Compare Doogee S98 Pro vs Hotwav CYBER 8