0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro

IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of IIIF150 R2022 with Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
IIIF150 R2022 Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
Antutu benchmark 313177 169833
CPU MediaTek Helio G95 MediaTek Helio P60
Diagonal size 6.78 " 6.26 "
Resolution 2460x1080 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 10
RAM 8 Gb 8 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 128 GB 128 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 64 Mp 48 Mp
Camera Four cameras Triple Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 16 Mp
Battery 8300 mAh 7500 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC Yes Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner Yes Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 11 Android 11
Material Plastics and rubber Plastics and rubber
Weight 350 g 323 g
Dimensions 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm 168 × 82 × 16 mm
  Price 176.72€ ($203.20) See Details 106.03€ ($121.91) See Details

IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the IIIF150 R2022’s camera vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp sensor and the 48Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
Rear camera 64 Mp 48 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Four LEDs Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 16 Mp 16 Mp
Flash No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name IIIF150 R2022 Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
Battery 8300 mAh 7500 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 14-15 hours 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours 30 hours
Fast charging Yes Yes
Wireless charging No No

IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison. IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro: Antutu benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 313177 score points which is 84.40% faster than the Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro, which got 169833. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
176.72€
$203.20
 
Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P60 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 7500mAh
106.03€
$121.91
 

IIIF150 R2022 vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

IIIF150 R2022 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 427 points score in "Single-core" of against the Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro which got 309, it is 38.19% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1550 vs 1489 (4.10% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

IIIF150 R2022
6.78 inches (2460x1080) Curved Glass / Helio G95 / 8Gb / 128GB / 64Mp / 8300mAh
176.72€
$203.20
 
Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
6.26 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Helio P60 / 8Gb / 128GB / 48Mp / 7500mAh
106.03€
$121.91
 

What is the difference between IIIF150 R2022 and Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 84.40% faster in the Antutu test (143344 score difference).
  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp compared to 48Mp
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1520x720.
  • More battery capacity: 8300mAh vs 7500mAh (a difference of 800mAh).

Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro (advantages)

  • Best weight: 27 grams less (323 vs 350).

Why it is better not to take Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • NFC supports.
  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have fast charging supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons

Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 120
Frequent comparisons