Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359844 | 61477 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 |
| Diagonal size | 6.6 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX258 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 6280 mAh | 4100 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 6.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal |
| Weight | 292 g | 175 g |
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 82.3 x 12.8 mm | 151.0 x 76.0 x 8 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav Cyber 15: Hotwav T5 Max - Compare Hotwav CYBER 8 4/64GB - Compare Hotwav W10 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb: Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro 12/256GB - Compare Xiaomi 13T Pro - Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G Global 4/128GB NFC - Compare |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber 15’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X’s camera, see the difference between the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 200 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | Sony IMX258 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Hotwav Cyber 15 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6280 mAh | 4100 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No |
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber 15 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359844 score points which is 485.33% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb, which got 61477. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber 15 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 588 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb which got 243, it is 141.98% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1915 vs 979 (95.61% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber 15 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber 15 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 485.33% faster in the Antutu test (298367 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 13Mp Sony IMX258
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1920x1080.
- More battery capacity: 6280mAh vs 4100mAh (a difference of 2180mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber 15 (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 117 grams less (175 vs 292).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have fast charging supports.
Hotwav Cyber 15 related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav W11
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav H1
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare LeEco Le 2 (X520/X526) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Xiaomi Redmi 6
- Compare Doogee S60 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X vs Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite Global