Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs IIIF150 R2022
Name | Hotwav Cyber X | IIIF150 R2022 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 353889 | 313177 |
CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G95 |
Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.78 " |
Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2460x1080 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 64 Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Four cameras |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
Battery | 10200 mAh | 8300 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Network | 4 G | 4 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | Yes |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 11 |
Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
Weight | 380 g | 350 g |
Dimensions | 181.8 x 85.1 x 17.5 mm | 175.7 x 84 x 15.5 mm |
Price | 139.82€ ($160.45) See Details | 177.07€ ($203.20) See Details |
Hotwav Cyber X vs IIIF150 R2022: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Hotwav Cyber X’s camera vs IIIF150 R2022’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 64Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Hotwav Cyber X | IIIF150 R2022 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 64 Mp | 64 Mp |
Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
Flash | Dual LED flash | Four LEDs |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 16 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber X vs IIIF150 R2022: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Hotwav Cyber X vs IIIF150 R2022, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Hotwav Cyber X | IIIF150 R2022 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 10200 mAh | 8300 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 14-15 hours |
Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Hotwav Cyber X vs IIIF150 R2022: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber X in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 353889 score points which is 13.00% faster than the IIIF150 R2022, which got 313177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Hotwav Cyber X vs IIIF150 R2022: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Hotwav Cyber X in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 587 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 R2022 which got 427, it is 37.47% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1876 vs 1550 (21.03% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Hotwav Cyber X and IIIF150 R2022? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber X (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 13.00% faster in the Antutu test (40712 score difference).
- More battery capacity: 10200mAh vs 8300mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber X (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 R2022 (advantages)
- Best weight: 30 grams less (350 vs 380).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 R2022 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Hotwav Cyber X related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X Pro vs Hotwav Cyber X
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Cubot King Kong 9 vs Hotwav Cyber X
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber X vs Hotwav W10
IIIF150 R2022 related comparisons
- Compare F150 R2022 vs OUKITEL WP17
- Compare F150 R2022 vs Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Compare F150 R2022 vs F150 H2022
- Compare IIIF150 R2022 vs IIIF150 Air1 Pro
- Compare F150 R2022 vs UMIDIGI Bison GT